D1
Position briefs
Each party's claims, supporting facts, and requested remedies — symmetrically structured, source-anchored, redaction-aware.
Seven structured stages, three human checkpoints, and one canonical record every output reconciles to. Objective, symmetric, and built around an amicable resolution.
AI-assisted overviews · figures illustrative · not legal advice.
Three core solutions, powered by the same neutral engine and directory. Each has its own overview — watch, hear, see, or read.
Both sides compared objectively and symmetrically — points of alignment and convergence options, then an agreed memorandum. Divorce & family, commercial and partner disputes, employment, HOA, and insurance claims.
See how it works →One-sided, attorney-in-the-loop preparation of filings and petitions — e.g., Article 81 guardianship or an attorney-grievance. A starting point for counsel review, never a substitute.
Where it applies →Assemble agreements with an optional mediation-before-litigation clause that opens a JusticeX matter if a dispute arises — feeding Two-Party Resolution. Individual-editable or organization-configured.
For organizations →The neutral engine underneath: completeness and evidence-quality signals, factual gap maps, symmetric summaries, and optional public precedent — never a legal-merit score or legal advice.
How the engine works →Route to a neutral mediator, attorney, or financial/tax professional when a matter needs one — no-fee, symmetric, and consent-based.
About the directory →The same solutions, mapped to each market. Full detail lives on the Markets page →
Objective Comparison and the Professional Directory apply across all markets and solutions. Documentation Preparation begins with NY guardianship and attorney-grievance matters.
The platform runs the matter end-to-end. You sign off at three human-in-the-loop checkpoints — after redaction, after the evidence-quality review, and before the joint session. Every other stage is deterministic, symmetric, and audit-logged.
Every output is citation-grounded, deterministically generated, and reconciled to the SPOC. Nothing leaves the matter without a counsel-readable trail back to its source.
Each party's claims, supporting facts, and requested remedies — symmetrically structured, source-anchored, redaction-aware.
Symmetric assessment of completeness and evidence quality on one shared rubric — the same for both sides; deltas surfaced for the mediator. Not a legal-merit or outcome score.
Objective option space, visualized. Concession curves, objection clusters, and points of alignment.
Draft agreement with clause-level citations to intake, statute, and prior comparable matters. Counsel-readable. Ready for counsel review and e-signature on sign-off.
Every prompt, every model output, every checkpoint sign-off — hash-chained, exportable, defensible under counsel review.
Per-matter symmetry audit. Deterministic check that both parties received the same prompts, scoring, and access at every stage.
Numbers below are the design-partner program's target band (pre-validation), set against the mediator's pre-platform baseline. We intend to commission an independent neutrality review as the program matures.
* Initial JusticeX practitioner-research estimates; figures will be refined against design-partner matters during Phase 1.
A 30-minute walkthrough on a redacted matter you bring, on your jurisdiction, in your dispute type. No deck. No pitch.