One objective, symmetric process — run across families, businesses, and government, delivered through whichever professional fits the matter.
AI-assisted overviews · figures illustrative · not legal advice.
We start where the package is most complete — New York family matters — and extend the same engine into adjacent markets as each one's rules, documents, and outputs are built out. Availability is marked honestly below.
Divorce, separation, custody, parenting plans, and support — plus the guardianship and estate matters around them. The launch market: highest volume, clearest documents, and the most complete rule-set and financial model. Reached directly, through a mediator or attorney, or through a sponsoring employer or organization.
Explore for families →Any business with disputes to resolve — especially those whose employee, partner, or commercial contracts call for mediation before litigation, with insurance carriers a marquee example. Two motions: resolve disputes with your constituents, or offer JusticeX to your people as a benefit.
See the business opportunity →Public agencies serve constituents and employ people — the same need for a fair, efficient, documented process, through contractor terms, program rules, and public-employer agreements.
See the opportunity →Businesses and government agencies put JusticeX to work two ways — resolve disputes with the outside parties you contract with, or offer it to your own team as a benefit. Same objective, symmetric process either way.
Ask the external parties you do business with — contractors, clients, partners, policyholders — to try objective, mediated comparison before litigation, through the policies, agreements, and terms you use today. The clause is the on-ramp; every qualifying dispute runs the same fair, documented process, and court access stays open.
Any organization whose agreements can call for mediation first.
Give employees a calmer, lower-cost way through personal matters — divorce, custody, estate, and everyday disputes. Fund it as a benefit, or make it available voluntarily and let them enroll on their own.
Fund it and you're the sponsor; offer it and they enroll — either way your people get JusticeX.
JusticeX stands on its own, and it partners with the mediators and attorneys you already work with — automating intake, redaction, symmetric summaries, and gap analysis so the process runs faster and more consistently, the professional focuses on judgment, and both sides leave with a clear, documented agreement. A more efficient path, designed to reduce the odds a matter escalates to litigation.
JusticeX provides objective, symmetric comparison — not legal advice, and not a substitute for a lawyer or a court. Parties, with their own counsel or a neutral, decide.
The same matter can be run by the people themselves, by a neutral mediator, by attorneys on each side, or by a financial/tax professional on the money questions — and the lead can change by matter or by step. Everyone works from the same objective comparison.
Both parties walk through the same structured process and reach their own resolution — days, not months — with a record ready for counsel review and e-signature.
I have a dispute →Arrive at the first joint session with position briefs, a symmetric comparison, and a gap map already prepared — so your hours go to the work that closes matters, not document handling.
Join the design-partner cohort → See how it works for mediators →Privilege, redaction, citation-grounding, and audit logging are runtime components, not policies. Sign-off gates produce a counsel-signed certificate. No referral fees — neutral by design.
Refer or represent → See how it works for attorneys →CPAs, financial, and tax professionals — neutral or per-party — own the financial and tax-modeling steps: net-of-tax, present value, and reconcile-to-net-estate. A role dashboard tracks the matters they refer or advise.
Join as a financial/tax pro → See how it works for financial/tax pros →Markets are reached through the professionals and organizations already serving them. These distribution channels carry the platform into each market; several are forward-looking and noted as such.
Mediation practices and law firms adopt JusticeX for their own caseloads and bring their clients onto the platform — the near-term engine, paired with the Families market. They run matters and refer them; no referral fees, neutral by design.
For mediators & attorneys →CPAs, CDFAs, and financial/tax professionals — neutral or per-party — own the financial and tax-modeling steps and refer the matters they advise, tracked from a role dashboard.
For financial & tax pros →HR, claims, contracts, case-management, court-data, and e-signature systems integrate JusticeX as the objective-comparison layer — so it fits the software organizations already run. Not just legal-tech.
Employers, HOAs, and schools that fund JusticeX for their people, or offer it as a voluntary benefit — reaching individuals in the Families market at the moment a dispute arises.
For sponsoring organizations →Prioritized by market volume, client accessibility, regulatory friction, AI fit, and competitive intensity. Phase 1 anchors the Families core and the top family-adjacent types; later phases expand into the workplace, community, and campus markets.
| # | Dispute type | Score | Phase | Why it fits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Divorce & Marital Dissolution | 25 / 25 | Phase 1 · Launch | Property, custody, support. Huge volume; emotionally driven; high attorney referral repeat-rate. |
| 02 | Child Custody & Parenting Plans | 25 / 25 | Phase 1 · Launch | Schedules, relocation. Courts already encourage mediation; clear AI template fit. |
| 03 | Landlord–Tenant Disputes | 23 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Evictions, deposits, lease breaches. Local courts overwhelmed; tenants lack legal access. |
| 04 | Small Claims & Consumer Disputes | 23 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Refunds, services, retail. Self-represented litigants need help; pure SaaS opportunity. |
| 05 | Neighbor & HOA Disputes | 21 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Boundaries, noise, HOA. No legal representation typically required; HOAs have budget. |
| 06 | Workplace Harassment (HR) | 21 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Pre-EEOC, internal complaints. A neutral, documented process for both sides — not an investigation, and not a substitute for mandated reporting. |
| 07 | Freelancer Payment Disputes | 21 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Gig non-payment, scope. Millions of U.S. freelancers; platforms lack dispute resolution. |
| 08 | Business Partnership Disputes | 21 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Equity splits, breach of duty. High willingness to pay to avoid litigation. |
| 09 | E-Commerce Marketplace Disputes | 21 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Shopify, eBay, Etsy. Embeddable API; revenue share with marketplaces. |
| 10 | Medical Bill & Provider Disputes | 21 / 25 | Phase 2 · Growth | Billing errors, insurance coordination. No-Surprises Act framework; high urgency. |
New York leads: equitable-distribution state, judicial AI integration in motion, permissive AI-disclosure rules, and rising consumer openness to AI for divorce. California and Utah follow on active ODR pilots; Texas through TRAIGA (HB 149) AI governance framework. Florida's stricter professional oversight makes it a later expansion.